Damien Hirst’s For the Love of God
Something of a sensation was caused by the
unveiling of Damien Hirst’s 2007 work For
the Love of God, a platinum cast of a human skull covered with over 8,000
flawless pavé diamonds. Admired and lambasted in equal measure, Hirst’s move
would seem to be a fair summation of his career, marked as it has been by
thematic concerns of belief, shock, beauty and death[1].
The skull was presented as the centre-piece
of Hirst’s solo exhibition Beyond Belief which
at the White Cube gallery in London
in 2007.
On visiting the exhibition, I found that the
theatrical presentation and media-hyped glamour of the experience were central
to the work’s effect. After acquiring a ticket, queuing, being searched and leaving
bags in an ante room, a group of us were let in for a strict two minute
viewing. The object glittered brilliantly in its cubic vitrine, the only
feature in the pitch black room, with spotlights concealed so that it seemed as
if the skull itself were the only light source.
Damien Hirst For
the Love of God platinum skull, diamonds, human teeth 2007
The sense of anticipation as we crowded at
the glass suggested a quasi-religious experience – as if we were at an ancient
holy place, seeing at last with our own eyes the true relic, until we were
called out and the next group of faithful ushered in. Indeed, the work in no
small measure invites comparison with a religious artifact; its suggestion of
physical residue (like the bone of a saint), its totemic symbolism, its
employment of costly materials (prompting associations of gilt and lapis
lazuli) giving it a decidedly numinous quality.
There was no doubt that the effect on the
viewer was dramatic. But leaving the exhibit I pondered exactly what had been
so impressive. Was it the sobering reminder of death behind the façade of
wealth? Was this diamond encrusted skull a poignant embodiment of the vanitas theme for the contemporary world?
Was there substance to reward critical investigation behind the hype or was it
just the latest episode in the headline-grabbing career of the infamous Hirst,
the erstwhile enfant terrible of the
British artworld?
The following tentative exploration of these
questions will attempt to draw out several themes: Firstly, the significance
and function of the skull as a symbolic device and contrasting ways in which it
could be read critically, secondly, the concept of luxury and the placement of
Hirst’s work as luxury object, and finally, ideas of death in our contemporary
western culture.
[1] Rudi Fuchs
discusses the themes of Hirst’s work in relation to the skull in his catalogue
essay Victory Over Decay published in
For the Love of God (Other
Criteria/White Cube 2007)
No comments:
Post a Comment